Christine's topic is interesting although a little less focused than others. Still, that's probably fine for the OCIS consortium because it is a place that she can refine her ideas. Strong letter from Marlene Huysman. I'd rate 4/5 admit, though slightly below Shollo.
I agree that this one is not as good as Shollo's. While combining social network analysis with semantic maps is interesting, the preliminary findings reported are not. I would not rate this one very high.
I found this one much less focused than some of the others. However, as Pam points out, this is not necessarily a bad thing for the doctoral consortium.
Comments
Christine's topic is
Christine's topic is interesting although a little less focused than others. Still, that's probably fine for the OCIS consortium because it is a place that she can refine her ideas. Strong letter from Marlene Huysman. I'd rate 4/5 admit, though slightly below Shollo.
I agree that this one is not
I agree that this one is not as good as Shollo's. While combining social network analysis with semantic maps is interesting, the preliminary findings reported are not. I would not rate this one very high.
I found this one much less
I found this one much less focused than some of the others. However, as Pam points out, this is not necessarily a bad thing for the doctoral consortium.
I bumped up my rating. I
I bumped up my rating. I think she's strong and might add a lot to the discussion.