@article {9999, title = {Building an apparatus: Refractive, reflective and diffractive readings of trace data}, journal = {Journal of the Association for Information Systems}, volume = {21}, year = {2020}, pages = {Article 10}, abstract = {

We propose a set of methodological principles and strategies for the use of trace data, i.e., data capturing performances carried out on or via information systems, often at a fine level of detail. Trace data comes with a number of methodological and theoretical challenges associated with the inseparable nature of the social and material. Drawing on Haraway and Barad{\textquoteright}s distinctions among refraction, reflection and diffraction, we compare three approaches to trace data analysis. We argue that a diffractive methodology allows us to explore how trace data are not given but created though construction of a research apparatus to study trace data. By focusing on the diffractive ways in which traces ripple through an apparatus, it is possible to explore some of the taken-for-granted, invisible dynamics of sociomateriality. Equally, important this approach allows us to describe what and when distinctions within entwined phenomena emerge in the research process. Empirically, we illustrate the guiding principles and strategies by analyzing trace data from Gravity Spy, a crowdsourced citizen science project on Zooniverse. We conclude by suggesting that a diffractive methodology may help us draw together quantitative and qualitative research practices in new and productive ways that also raises interesting design questions.

}, doi = {10.17705/1jais.00590 }, attachments = {https://crowston.syr.edu./sites/crowston.syr.edu/files/RA-JAIS-17-0130.R3.1_FIN\%20to\%20share.pdf}, author = {Carsten {\O}sterlund and Kevin Crowston and Corey Brian Jackson} } @proceedings {9999, title = {Blending machine and human learning processes}, year = {2017}, abstract = {

Citizen science projects rely on contributions from volunteers to achieve their scientific goals and so face a dilemma: providing volunteers with explicit training might increase the quality of contributions, but at the cost of losing the work done by newcomers during the training period, which for many is the only work they will contribute to the project. Based on research in cognitive science on how humans learn to classify images, we have designed an approach to use machine learning to guide the presentation of tasks to newcomers that help them more quickly learn how to do the image classification task while still contributing to the work of the project. A Bayesian model for tracking this learning is presented.

}, doi = {10.24251/HICSS.2017.009}, url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10125/41159}, attachments = {https://crowston.syr.edu./sites/crowston.syr.edu/files/training\%20v3\%20to\%20share_0.pdf}, author = {Kevin Crowston and Carsten {\O}sterlund and Lee, Tae Kyoung} } @proceedings {2015, title = {Being Present in Online Communities: Learning in Citizen Science}, year = {2015}, address = {Limerick, Ireland}, abstract = {

How online community members learn to become valuable contributors constitutes a long-standing concern of Community \& Technology researchers. The literature tends to highlight participants{\textquoteright} access to practice, feedback from experienced members, and relationship building. However, not all crowdsourcing environments offer participants opportunities for access, feedback, and relationship building (e.g., Citizen Science). We study how volunteers learn to participate in a citizen science project, Planet Hunters, through participant observation, interviews, and trace ethnography. Drawing on S{\o}rensen{\textquoteright}s sociomaterial theories of presence, we extend the notion of situated learning to include several modes of learning. The empirical findings suggest that volunteers in citizen science engage more than one form of access to practice, feedback, and relationship building. Communal relations characterize only one form of learning. Equally important to their learning are authority{\textendash}subject and agent-centered forms of access, feedback, and relationship building.

}, doi = {10.1145/2768545.2768555}, attachments = {https://crowston.syr.edu./sites/crowston.syr.edu/files/C\%26T_2015_FINAL.pdf}, author = {Gabriel Mugar and Carsten {\O}sterlund and Corey Jackson and Kevin Crowston} } @proceedings {568, title = {Boundary-Spanning Documents in Online FLOSS Communities: Does One Size Fit All?}, year = {2013}, month = {1/2013}, address = {Wailea, HI}, attachments = {https://crowston.syr.edu./sites/crowston.syr.edu/files/floss\%20documents\%20to\%20distribute.pdf}, author = {Carsten {\O}sterlund and Kevin Crowston} } @conference {368, title = {Boundary-spanning documents in online communities (Research-in-Progress)}, booktitle = {International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS)}, year = {2011}, month = {12/2011}, address = {Shanghai, China}, abstract = {Online communities bring together people with varied access to and understanding of the work at hand, who must collaborate through documents of various kinds. We develop a framework articulating the characteristics of documents supporting collaborators with asymmetric access to knowledge versus those with symmetric knowledge. Drawing on theories about document genre, boundary objects and provenance, we hypothesize that documents supporting asymmetric groups are likely to articulate or prescribe their own 1) purpose, 2) context of use and 3) content and form and 4) provenance in greater detail than documents used by people with symmetric access to knowledge. We are testing these hypotheses through content analysis of documents and instructions from a variety of free/libre open source projects. We present preliminary findings consistent with the hypotheses developed. The completed study will suggest new directions for research on communications in online communities, as well as advice for those supporting such communities. }, keywords = {boundary objects, Documents, Genre, Online communities, provenance}, attachments = {https://crowston.syr.edu./sites/crowston.syr.edu/files/s1-ln10612586-928182863-1939656818Hwf394207478IdV-120335818210612586PDF_HI0001.pdf}, author = {Carsten {\O}sterlund and Kevin Crowston} } @article {Crowston:2008, title = {Bug Fixing Practices within Free/Libre Open Source Software Development Teams}, journal = {Journal of Database Management}, volume = {19}, number = {2}, year = {2008}, pages = {1{\textendash}30}, abstract = {Free/libre open source software (FLOSS, e.g., Linux or Apache) is primarily developed by distributed teams. Developers contribute from around the world and coordinate their activity almost exclusively by means of email and bulletin boards, yet some how profit from the advantages and evade the challenges of distributed software development. In this article we investigate the structure and the coordination practices adopted by development teams during the bug-fixing process, which is considered one of main areas of FLOSS project success. In particular, based on a codification of the messages recorded in the bug tracking system of four projects, we identify the accomplished tasks, the adopted coordination mechanisms, and the role undertaken by both the FLOSS development team and the FLOSS community. We conclude with suggestions for further research.}, issn = {1063-8016 }, attachments = {https://crowston.syr.edu./sites/crowston.syr.edu/files/jdbm2008.pdf}, author = {Kevin Crowston and Scozzi, Barbara} } @inbook {Crowston:2008b, title = {The bug fixing process in proprietary and free/libre open source software: A coordination theory analysis}, booktitle = {Business Process Transformation}, year = {2008}, pages = {69-99}, publisher = {M. E. Sharpe}, organization = {M. E. Sharpe}, address = {Armonk, NY}, abstract = {To support business process transformation, we must first be able to represent business processes in a way that allows us to compare and contrast them or to design new ones. In this paper, I use coordination theory to analyze the bug fixing processes in the proprietary operating system development group of a large mini-computer manufacturer and for the Free/Libre Open Source Software Linux operating system kernel. Three approaches to identifying dependencies and coordination mechanisms are presented. Mechanisms analyzed include those for task assignment, resource sharing and managing dependencies between modules of source code. The proprietary development organization assigned problem reports to engineers based on the module that appeared to be in error, since engineers only worked on particular modules. Alternative task assignment mechanisms include assignment to engineers based on workload or voluntary assignment, as in Linux. In the proprietary process, modules of source code were not shared, but rather {\textquotedblleft}owned{\textquotedblright} by one engineer, thus reducing the need for coordination. In Linux, where multiple developers can work on the same modules, alternative resource sharing mechanisms have been developed to manage source code. Finally, the proprietary developers managed dependencies between modules informally, relying on their personal knowledge of which other engineers used their code. The Linux process allows developers to change code in multiple modules, but emphasizes modularity to reduce the need to do so.}, keywords = {Coordination, FLOSS}, isbn = {9780765611918}, attachments = {https://crowston.syr.edu./sites/crowston.syr.edu/files/The\%20bug\%20fixing\%20process\%20in\%20proprietary\%20.pdf}, author = {Kevin Crowston}, editor = {Grover, Varun and Markus, M. Lynne} } @article {Howison:2007, title = {Building a collaboratory for research on open source software development (Poster)}, year = {2007}, address = {Ann Arbor, MI}, keywords = {eScience, FLOSS}, attachments = {https://crowston.syr.edu./sites/crowston.syr.edu/files/Howison_eSocSciPoster-small.pdf}, author = {James Howison and Squire, Megan and Kevin Crowston} } @conference {Rubleske:2007, title = {Building a Corpus of Genre-Tagged Web Pages for an Information-Access Experiment}, booktitle = {Colloquium on Web Genres, Corpus Linguistics}, year = {2007}, address = {Birmingham, UK}, attachments = {https://crowston.syr.edu./sites/crowston.syr.edu/files/corpus.longabstract.revised.IV16.pdf}, author = {Rubleske, Joe and Kevin Crowston and Kwa{\'s}nik, Barbara H. and Chun, You-Lee} }